It has already been mentioned that some of Postman’s ideas are outdated due to the ever-increasing advancement of technology. However, I am interested in discussing what Postman’s opinions might have been about how the internet has affected public discourse. At first, it would seem to be a transformation for the better as the majority of on-line discourse is done through the written word; however, these words very rarely have much depth, almost never contain any detailed exposition or analysis, and have at best only the faintest hint of propositional content. A new, dominant medium has arrived on the scene, but it seems to have arrived too late to actually benefit us. Our intellect is already so compromised form the effects of a century of television that the internet only seems to have magnified the effects (so far). The already-over-abundance of information has only increased, the capacity for which is now infinite. The internet has only taken the effects of television to absurd extremes, and while the capability for it to become a glowing bastion of intellectual content and intelligent discussion and debate certainly exists, as of now, it has become the new soma, only much stronger.
Therefore, Postman’s book is more relevant now than ever, at this critical time when we move form the Age of Show Business to the Age of YouTube, when a new medium once again has taken over and is working its subtle effects on our epistemology. It may be some time before the effects of this technology become clear, but by then, they will probably be so common and widespread as to be invisible, just like the effects of television on our minds today. Consequently, Postman’s prescription is necessary: children must be taught about the differences in the inherent biases in different forms of media, and how to properly assimilate and contextualize the massive amounts of information that assault us every day. We must ultimately begin to realize that these are serious times we live in, that without intelligent discussion and debate the problems that face us will never be solved, and our societies will crumble and fall as we continue watching TV, surfing the web, and amusing ourselves to death.
Monday, August 18, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This is a very good point that you raise. The internet is just an expansion on the destructive force that is television. As much as this is true, there are some that would raise a counter-argument to your arguement.
As much as television has harmed our society and as much as the internet is amplifying television's effect, there is a difference here.
Television has no real "proper" use, however there are many useful things that the internet can do. The internet, unlike the television, can provide accurate data that CAN be used in everyday life, it just depends on how the information is used. To paraphrase what Postman said, "there is an abundance of useless information provided by the telegraph (and now television) that has little, or no relevance to our everday life." This can be true of the internet as well, but only to those people who do not look for information relevant to what is needed.
For example: if a teacher gives an assignment that has to be researched then that information Postman said was "useless and abundant" now finds its purpose.
So as far as MOST internet surfers go, yes the internet is another brain numbing device designed to simply amuse the general public. But as for those few people that use the knowlege on the internet for its "proper" use instead of its amusing intention, the internet can be a useful tool in communicating relevant information for good purposes.
Post a Comment